To Tell Or Not To Tell?
Poly Means Many: There are many aspects of polyamory. Each month six bloggers – An Open Book, One Sub’s Mission, Polyamorous Parenting, Post Modern Sleaze, Rarely Wears Lipstick and Amanda Jones – will write about their views on one of them.
This month: “Explaining non-monogamy” My take: “Should we have to?”
Strictly speaking what you do with your private life should be, well, the clue’s in the name really! Whether you feel comfortable talking about sex and/or relationships is largely a function of your upbringing, your current environment, and the specific set of tacit rules you’ve agreed to follow with that group.
When it comes to non-standard relationship formats, this can become additionally tricky. Where you might happily mention in passing the mundane details of a monogamous relationship, mentioning similar with multiple partners or metamours, whilst possibly desirable, can sometimes seem more trouble than it’s worth.
There are a range of relationships which might not have easily expressible forms (let alone socially acceptable ones). It can feel difficult to casually mention a connection (“my boyfriend’s other girlfriend”, “my FWB”…) without feeling as if you should then launch into a long explanation of how it’s all okay and everyone knows, or that this is a long-term agreement – just a casual one. So, all too often, we don’t mention them at all.
Now, broadly speaking, I think it’s fair to divide up those interactions that are based on sex, and those that are based on love. Of course this isn’t to say that many wont have aspects of both, but most are clearly rooted in one or the other. And personally, I see no reason to tell you, my colleagues, or my family about my sex life; however exciting, interesting or unusual it may be! It can be tempting to drop salacious hints and almost brag about our uniqueness but frankly, if it wouldn’t be appropriate for a mono relationshipped person to mention a new sex position they’d tried that weekend, it’s also not appropriate for a poly person to mention a new sex partner they’d tried that weekend! It’s not complex here: sex is not family dinner conversation.
Love, though, is an entirely other matter. It is far more appropriate for me to mention my partner to my colleagues and my family, bordering on inappropriate if I don’t. It is a matter of public record what your relationship state is. I had to tell my mobile phone provider if I was single or not, my letting agent too… this stuff really is common knowledge.
Which is where this blog may get contentious…
Ethical non-monogamy is about open, honest relationships and I don’t believe that is restricted to one partner knowing about another. If you have two equal partners and you publicly acknowledge one and refer to the other as “your friend” or they go unmentioned, you’re still not being honest.
Sure there’s a difference between lying, lying by omission, and simply omitting. If you don’t want to talk about your relationships, don’t! Blanket omission is fine! Speaking about your girl/boyfriend as your ‘friend’, for any length of time or to anyone important, is a lie by omission and I feel is okay only in very certain circumstances. (Mainly only when, after informed discussion, it’s been mutually agreed as the least harmful course of action) If you’re telling outright lies, well, clearly I’d strongly counter the ethics of that.
Essentially you get to make a fundamental choice with regards to what you share about your life. You should never feel obliged to disclose the details of your sex / love life to anyone. However, if you’re going to speak about your relationship(s) you’re on dangerous moral ground if you start looking at that pair/group of people and revealing some and hiding others.
Mid-post disclaimer now, because clearly this is a far bigger topic than I, or a small group of bloggers, can ever tackle. I am not saying it’s simple or even that I am right. But I want to raise the question. As an ethical non-monogamist, is it still ethical and open to publically acknowledge one relationship but not another of equal value?
As a non-primary I can only imagine that being put in a position where you’d like to acknowledge your partner but their situation with their family, say, means you have to remain a secret; keep pictures off of facebook, be careful what you say in public etc, would feel an awful lot like the deceit of regular cheating.
Bottom line.
Talk about your life, or don’t, that’s your choice. But If you love someone and share your life with them lying about how much they mean to you, asking them to let that lie pervade and requiring other partners to be accessories to that is, in my likely-to-be-flamed opinion, not actually that open or ethical at all.
Discuss!
Profile cancel
Featured Updates
Latest Comments




I see what you mean, but… I guess I’ve not yet been in a situation that demands the awkward full explanation so as not to lie. I’ve not yet been introduced to a partner’s parents and had to answer questions about other relationships, and I have yet to introduce other partners to my own family (mostly because I don’t see them very often myself).
Having been in a long-term relationship for years, that’s some people’s framework for how they view me. Unless questions arise from my mentining names of other people, the subject of non-monogamy just doesn’t come up. To be perfectly honest, all the people I want to know already know. All the people I care about that much, know what’s going on in my life. My extended family and co-workers can know but don’t, mostly because chatter with them is usually only small-talk.
I have no problem with a partner who I am not a primary to simply describing me as a friend, or not mentioning me at all. But, I guess that’s perhaps because I have a primary relationship of my own?
Agreed. I think the important thing here is fairness. All things being equal – all things should be equal! iykwim :)
Hence: “If you have *two equal partners* and you publicly acknowledge one and refer to the other as “your friend” or they go unmentioned..”
So: “I have no problem with a partner *who I am not a primary to* simply describing me as a friend, or not mentioning me at all.” is in total agreement. If your situations aren’t equal, of course they don’t need to be presented as such.
A topic very close to my heart. In my case, one of my partners is not out about me to her parents, many of her friends, her colleagues etc. I am “the friend” she sees often – goes to visit and goes on holidays with. For the moment I try to be understanding about this, mainly because her parents (her father, specifically) is very homophobic, and her fear of “coming out” about me has more to do with the reactions of homophobia from her parents as opposed to any negative reactions about polyamory. I won’t lie – it does bother me. I don’t like being “the friend.” Because that’s not all that I am to her (and vice versa), by a long way.
But I also know there are a couple areas of my life where I have chosen to remain closeted – specifically in my work life because I work in a lot of countries where “deviancy” in whatever form can be punishable by death (be it by the mob, or the state). In that context it is my sense of self-preservation that keeps me closeted.
I struggle with this every day, as being open and honest is a main tenet of my internalised personal ethics, and I feel that I (and we) live a contradiction of that in many ways. However, I do feel these high ethics may need to be compromised on occasion. I don’t want to be a target for violent homophobia in some of the countries I work in and visit, and I don’t want our relationship to be the cause of major strife with my girlfriend’s father.
I recognise that neither of these situations can remain as they are indefinitely though. Eventually, something will have to give, and I’ve had conversations with my partners to this effect. I don’t think any serious committed love relationship can live in the closet for years (and survive all of the white lies and lies of omission etc that are necessary for that) without negative impact. The erosion of a relationship from this is of far more concern to me than any deviation from or compromise on ethics.
Some very specific examples to a very general sentiment there!
Broadly speaking though, it seems like we agree? As I posted, I don’t see that your personal life would necessarily be the business of your colleagues even if it, and your line of work, were totally traditional. It’s regrettable when both partners (for whatever reason) mutually agree that the least harmful course of action is to keep something hidden – as in the case of a homophobic parent. And yes, these create moral and emotional dissonance to the ethical and open stance we all strive for which probably need to be temporary..
I think that you are right, for some definitions of open and some definitions of ethical. People can be in closeted relationships for all kinds of reasons, and I don’t think that I can easily deem them *all* “unethical”. I think it is clear that if you say “friend” and you mean “wife”, you are not being honest, but if everyone involved thinks this is the best solution, you are still being ethical. I don’t think that honesty is always an ethical necessity, or even a good thing.
But what you have got me thinking is whether you *can* have two equally committed, equally important relationships when one is publicly acknowledged to all and sundry, and the other is “just a friend”. Can those relationships be considered “equal”? Unlike you, I think you this situation can easily be described as ethical and open (for the definition of “open” we usually use to describe open relationships, at least), but I’m not sure about equal. But I have a lot of sympathy for those who feel unable (for personal, social or even legal reasons) that they can’t get to this position of equality, even though they might want to.
Whether honesty is an ethical necessity is a very good point to clarify. I think it is an ethical “ideal”. An ideal that is, admittedly, hard-tending-to-impossible to achieve (hence mentioning a few of the cases that can complicate this). It may be, as above, that both partners agree that the least harmful course of action is not to disclose. The important part (for me) is that this is an agreement between *them both/all*, not an enforced silence.
In response to your second point: I think if you’re keeping your relationship with someone hidden you’re curbing that equality, yes.
With regards to this being open/ethical I guess my argument is stolen from Caitlin Moran’s shorthand feminism argument, ‘does this apply to men too?’, and if there are hoops a chronologically-second but not emotionally-secondary partner has to jump through, that the chronologically-first partner doesn’t.. I feel we should be asking questions.
(I’m not even that convinced of how ideal honesty is – I think honesty is often hurtful, and the ethical benefits of lying or just fudging the truth are under-appreciated.)
Yes – that’s what I was getting at. It may be that there is no option other than to hide one relationship, but it still means that there are certain privileges one relationship has that the other doesn’t, which makes equality difficult.
My take on honesty is this: it’s one of the cornerstone of my ethics. I think the importance of being honest, certainly with yourself, cannot be overstated, because without it, you will never see life as it really is.
But honesty is not the same thing as disclosure. There are many, many things I don’t say, and I have a large amount of safeguards around telling people my truth. I rarely volunteer information unless it is welcome: but ask me direct questions, and I will be honest.
By contrast, I think equality is overrated. We are not all equal, and we do not need to be. What we need is the space to be ourselves (and we need to take that space if necessary). The limiter on this is that we have equal worth as people, of course: and we all have autonomy, unless we consent not to.
It’s perhaps not the place to get into this, but I nearly entirely disagree! Lying (not just witholding the truth) is often the more ethical choice. So while I think honesty is a good default, treating it as fundamentally ethical can often lead to hurt feelings, unnecessary cruelty or worse. There are plenty of times when lying has saved lives where honesty would have lost them!
And I will never agree that equality is overrated! You need equality of opportunity in order to have the “space to be yourself”. That may not lead to an equality of outcome, but that’s a different matter.
Re: “I’m not even that convinced of how ideal honesty is”… You do ealise I’m going to refer back to this whenever I feel guilty for telling a white lie to avoid hurting someone’s feelings, don’t you? :-)
One of my favourite characters from one of my favourite plays by one of my favourite writers says this to an idealistic young noblewoman who tells him she has only told two lies in her life: “Dear young lady: isn’t that rather a short allowance? I’m quite a straightforward man myself; but it wouldn’t last me a whole morning.”
Broadly speaking – I agree with you. But, it’s really hard to be open all the time. I’ve lived a double life for most of my life, in a way. All of my family (minus my Dad) are strongly religious, of a faith that believes sex before marriage and homosexuality are wrong. Whilst they cope with the fact that I have premarital sex, they’re enormously homophobic. This has so far not been a problem, as though I’ve had sex with women, I’ve never had an ongoing relationship with one. If they knew anything at all about my kinky life, they’d go nuts. If I did get a girlfriend, and disclosed the fact, then they’d literally, disown me.
I hope ‘telling them’ or not is never an issue, but until then, I continue to either avoid talking about my personal life altogether, or coating it in baby white lies.
Yes, this does create ‘dissonance’ in a way, in terms of my familial relationships. I love them utterly, and they me, but there’s a part of me that they’ll never know, and that’s kind of sad.
On the same hand, they never talk directly to me about God or religion, in a sort of unspoken, you don’t talk about your stuff, we don’t talk about our stuff, kind of way.
Whether some things really are better left unsaid – or whether it’s better to live a life completely being yourself.. I really don’t know. Interesting topic though!
I think we agree more than you suggest. I am in no way advocating blanket openness, and certainly not about your sex life (family never need to know about that!) It’s the polyamory bit I’m concerned with, and how we deal differently with additional *relationships*. Because whilst the first relationship is socially acceptable, the next one isn’t.
No matter how important, or what the circumstances, person number 2 (chronologically) is the one that breaks the mould, and the temptation to treat them differently because of it is high. For a controlled variable (“all other things being equal”) I just find the ‘whys’ and ‘hows’ around the ethics of that fun to explore..
Yep, I do agree with you. I just hope I never have to make that choice! i.e, if disclosing one relationship means that you lose another (e.g, a family member, who freaks out), Well that just sucks. It would be a wonderful world if everyone accepted everyone and all the people they love, but, unfortunately, that’s not the case.
Do all people deserve the truth equally? A lot of times I don’t tell people because I don’t respect them enough to patiently go through ethical-nonmonogamy again, or deal with their homophobia, or hear bullshit from them about how my children must be at risk because OMG, sexually fulfilled woman, won’t somebody puh-leaaaaase think of the children?!
If I’m not out, it has very little to do with my respect and esteem for my partners and everything to do with my respect for the person I’m speaking to.
Committed homophobes and sex-negative busybodies who haven’t changed their mind since they learned to tie their shoes don’t deserve my efforts, and my partners and my children certainly don’t deserve their ill-informed and bigoted remarks.